
A 10BestForexBrokers.com data report · July 2026
Canadian regulators are now disabling roughly 23 fraudulent investment websites every day. Over the same period, formal CIRO enforcement penalties have fallen 59%. We compiled the public data from CIRO, the CSA and the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre to explain what those two facts, together, mean for anyone opening a trading account in Canada.
Methodology & reuse. Every figure in this report comes from published regulator and government sources, each linked inline. Nothing here is modelled or estimated except where explicitly labelled. Charts and findings may be reproduced with attribution and a link to this page. Media enquiries: see contact.
Key findings
- 3,900+ fraudulent investment sites deactivated in ~5.5 months — about 23 per day — involving more than 6,900 URLs.
- CIRO enforcement fines fell 59%, from $25.1M (FY2023) to $10.3M (FY2025), while complaint volumes stayed flat at roughly 4,100 per year.
- Investment fraud is now ~50% of all reported fraud losses in Canada — $351M of the record $704M lost in 2025.
- Reported losses may capture as little as 5–10% of the real total, implying true investment-fraud losses of $3.5–7 billion a year.
- Only 8% of Canadians would report investment fraud to their securities regulator — despite 23% having been approached with one.
1. The takedown surge: 23 fraud sites a day
In December 2025, the CSA and CIRO disclosed the first results of a new capability aimed at fraudulent investment websites. Between June 5 and November 23, 2025 — roughly 171 days — regulators deactivated more than 3,900 fake investment platforms and crypto scam websites, spanning over 6,900 individual URLs.
That works out to roughly 23 fraudulent sites disabled every single day, including weekends. It is, by some distance, the clearest available measure of how industrialised online investment fraud targeting Canadians has become — and it is a measure of the sites regulators found and killed, not the total that exist.
2. Meanwhile, formal enforcement has contracted sharply
Set that against CIRO’s own enforcement numbers, and a striking divergence appears. Comparing CIRO’s FY2025 Enforcement Report with its inaugural FY2023 report:
| Measure | FY2023 | FY2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaints reviewed | 4,104 | 4,127 | Flat |
| Investigations conducted | 187 | 176 | ▼ 6% |
| Proceedings completed | 108 | 57 | ▼ 47% |
| Fines, costs & disgorgement | $25,140,343 | $10,313,381 | ▼ 59% |
Complaints are flat. Investigations are broadly flat. But completed proceedings nearly halved and total penalties fell by 59%.
An important caveat, and we want to be fair to CIRO here: a fall in fines is not automatically a fall in effectiveness. Enforcement totals are lumpy — a single large settlement can swing a year’s figure by millions. CIRO has also been acquiring genuinely stronger statutory powers, with Ontario becoming the seventh province to grant CIRO its full enforcement toolkit in 2025. Deterrence is not measured in dollars alone.
But the structural point stands, and it matters for retail traders: CIRO’s enforcement reach extends to its member firms. The 3,900 sites being taken down are, almost by definition, not CIRO members. They sit outside the system entirely. Which means the two numbers aren’t in tension — they’re describing two different worlds. And only one of them has a regulator standing behind your money.
3. Investment fraud is now half of all fraud losses in Canada
The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre recorded $704 million in reported fraud losses in 2025 — the worst year on record, with cumulative losses since 2022 now above $2.4 billion.
Investment fraud alone accounted for $351 million of that: the largest single category by dollar value, up from $310 million in 2024. Roughly half of every dollar Canadians reported losing to fraud last year was lost to an investment scam.
And the CAFC is blunt that this is a floor: it estimates only 5–10% of fraud is ever reported. Apply that to investment fraud alone and the implied real figure is somewhere between $3.5 billion and $7 billion a year. We flag that as an inference, not a measurement — but it is the regulator’s own multiplier applied to the regulator’s own number.
4. The verification gap
The CSA’s 2024 Investor Index exposes why the reported numbers stay low. Nearly half of Canadians (46%) have seen investment opportunities promoted on social media. Almost a quarter (23%) say they’ve been approached with a possibly fraudulent investment — a five-point rise since 2020.
But only 8% would report an investment fraud to their securities commission. Four times as many (34%) would go to the police instead. The regulator with the power to freeze accounts, issue warnings and pull registrations is the last body most people would tell.
The CSA also notes something that should worry anyone who assumes fraud is a seniors’ problem: investment-fraud incidence is trending upward among Canadians aged 55 and under, with rising attempts targeting people new to investing and those with little savings.
5. What this means if you’re opening a trading account
Put the four findings together and a single practical conclusion falls out.
The Canadian regulatory system — CIRO membership, CIPF protection, OBSI dispute resolution — is genuinely strong, and it is the thing standing between you and the $351 million column. But it only protects you if the firm you’re dealing with is inside it. Enforcement action against a CIRO member is a system working. A takedown of a fraudulent site is a system catching something that was never in it — after, in most cases, someone already lost money.
The 23-a-day figure is the real story. It says the volume of illegitimate platforms soliciting Canadians is not a fringe problem; it is the dominant feature of the online landscape. Which makes the two minutes you spend checking a broker’s registration the single highest-return activity available to a retail trader.
The check that costs two minutes.
- Find the broker’s legal entity name (site footer), not the brand.
- Search it on the CSA National Registration Search.
- Confirm CIRO membership on the CIRO dealer list — that’s what triggers CIPF protection.
- Scan the CSA investor alerts for the name.
Or run it through our free Broker Safety Analyzer, which does the first pass instantly.
6. A note on impersonation
One pattern deserves specific mention because it targets exactly the trust this report is about. CIRO has published investor alerts about entities impersonating CIRO itself — including a case involving “One FX Group / One FX Trading,” where fraudsters used CIRO and IIROC logos on fake letters purporting to guarantee deposits, and claimed CIRO regulation to gain trust while offering forex, stock, index and commodity trading.
The lesson is uncomfortable but important: a claim of CIRO regulation is not evidence of CIRO regulation. Logos can be copied; registration entries cannot. Always verify on the regulator’s own site, never on the broker’s.
Sources
- CSA & CIRO, “Canadian securities regulators’ new capability disarms more than 3,900 fraudulent investment websites” (Dec 2025)
- CIRO, 2025 Enforcement Report (June 25, 2025)
- Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre / Competition Bureau, Fraud Prevention Month 2026 data
- CSA, CAFC & RCMP, “Canadians losing millions to investment scams” + CSA Investor Index 2024
- Osler, “Expanded enforcement powers: is CIRO now exercising ‘statutory’ powers?” (2025)
- CIRO, Investor Alerts
Related research and tools
- Broker Safety Analyzer — check any broker instantly
- Canada forex regulation guide — how CIRO, CIPF and the CSA work
- Is your forex broker safe?
- Best forex brokers in Canada — CIRO-regulated only
This report compiles publicly published regulator and government data for informational purposes. It is not financial, legal, or tax advice, and it is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named firm. Figures are as reported by their sources at the time of publication; regulator data is periodically restated. Where we have applied a stated regulator estimate (such as the CAFC’s 5–10% reporting rate) to derive a range, we label it as an inference. Compiled by Mark Prosz. See our methodology. Last updated July 2026.
